Today’s post begins with a fractal called MixIt. Read my commentary on The Spiderwick Chronicles and you’ll probably see why I picked that as the image.
-
It wasn’t too long into The Spiderwick Chronicles that I realized I’D SEEN THIS MOVIE BEFORE. Of course then it had a different title (The Seeker) and a different cast of characters but it was essentially the same movie. The story is pretty much the same: disaffected “Tween” boy finds himself in a strange out of the way place where he encounters a magical secret that thrusts him into a "cosmic" battle he never planned on. I don’t need to say much of anything else about the story. You can almost hear the gears grinding away as the plot takes you from one point to the next. (I saw this movie in a theater full of youngsters and I don’t even think THEY were surprised.)
-
Freddie Highmore (in his third movie in six months) plays Jared (the “disaffected tween” I mentioned earlier). He’s angry about having to leave his home and Father in New York City to some moldering old Victorian manse in the hinterlands. He also plays his own twin brother Simon (but manages to never give the impression that he’s playing against himself via “split screen” imaging). Character Actors David Strathairn (playing Arthur Spiderwick) and Joan Plowright (“crazy“ Aunt Lucinda) do fine with their roles Seth Rogen plays to type as the voice of Hognose the Goblin as does Martin Short providing the voice of Thimbletack--a brownie who sometimes morphs into a boggart. The effects, a mix of models and C.G.I. are acceptable if not super spectacular. The directing is suitable and the music is quite nice. In the end, it is just the overall similarity to The Seeker that really bothers me.
-
The Spiderwick Chronicles isn’t a particularly bad movie--but it suffers terribly from bad timing. (If this movie and The Seeker I’d probably be making the same complaints about that one.) It lacks originality and doesn’t really make up for that with “heart” or “charm” but it is a nice, safe movie the whole family can watch.
-
FINAL GRADE: C-
I picked today’s image--Grayscale 3--because of the shape and color. I see it as a convoluted mess in shades of gray while some others might see it as a nothing but black and white. Rather like the situation I’ll be discussing…
-
Wednesday the New York Times featured a “Page One” story saying Republican front-runner John McCain may have had an “inappropriate” relationship with 31 year-old telecommunications lobbyist Vicki Iseman. During his run in 2004. McCain characterized the woman as “a friend“ and vigorously denied the accusation. The newspaper stands by their story. (Feel free to research the story if you need all the gory details.)
-
Did he or didn’t he? Frankly--I don’t know and frankly I don’t care. The lady is pretty enough and if McCain is “gettin’ some” more power to him: that’s between him and his wife and shouldn’t concern anyone else. What I find interesting is who is saying what about the story. The Democrats aren’t commenting at present (but you gotta know they are digging in to this story looking for anything they can use). Republican commentators are ramping up the old “liberal media bias” song and dance (while ignoring the fact that the “liberal media” has given them their platform). Elizabeth Hasslebeck claimed this final “proved” the liberal bias of the New York Times (which, by the way, is the same paper that endorsed John McCain as the Republican candidate for President a few weeks earlier). Rush Limbaugh stated: “this is what happens when you reach across the aisle.” (What the hell does that even mean? How is it relevant? Can someone tell me?)
-
Personally I found a little fact buried in the article to be the most interesting part of the story. It seems that while McCain was Chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee several of Ms. Iseman’s clients got important contracts--and they also contributed heavily to McCain’s campaign. (Oddly enough this part of the story isn‘t getting any coverage at all and I really wonder why.) Is it inappropriate? I don’t know but it seems a trifle “fishy” to me. Maybe it’s just doing political “business as usual” but I’d like to know more. McCain has run as the candidate of “character” but it seems he’s no better than any other politician. Maybe that is the price we have to pay for those running for office but it still makes me sad.
-
Is there more to come in the story? God I hope so--otherwise the newspaper may have hung itself out to dry. All I know for certain is that we need to know more about their relationship so I hope the story doesn‘t die or get swept under the rug.-Think about it.
Today’s post begins with a fractal called Button 2. It seemed appropriate because jeans have buttons and this post continues the saga of trying to find the perfect pair of jeans for my lady Robyn. So--lets get on with the sequel NOBODY asked for!
-
Some of you may wonder how it is that I ended up getting involved in Robyn’s “Jeans Quest.” Basically there are two reasons: 1) when I’m out with her I have two choices--go with her or stay in the car. 2) as a devoted hubby I feel it’s my duty to make sure Robyn doesn’t end up buying something completely awful. (Of the two of us I’m the one with the fashion sense.) Once Robyn told me she needed a second pair of jeans I knew I’d be writing a follow-up post. So here is the continuing saga…
-
We first decided to check out Old Navy but quickly found out that they don’t carry “plus size” clothes. They DO have a large “on line” shop though--which we checked out. Their on-line store has almost two dozen different options in jeans at very affordable prices. Unfortunately, most of those styles are “low rise”--death for the short waistedd. They also don’t have easily-accessible Size Charts so Robyn decided not to risk buying anything. (Having been burned once she wasn’t anxious to go the catalog route again.)
-
We tried visiting the J. C. Penny store at Main Place even less successful than our visit to the Westminster Mall store. The “Woman’s Wear Department” was even smaller than the other store--thus fewer selections. The jeans selection was in “broken” sizes and Robyn couldn’t find anything that remotely fit.
-
A snotty Clerk at The Gap told us “we don’t sell stuff for fat chicks!” I can understand stores are going to cater to selected clientele--but these stores really need to train their clerks to be more polite. “Fat Chicks” might want to buy gifts for smaller-sized friends and family: still, if this is an indication of how they can expect to be treated at The Gap I’d suggest “fat chicks” spend their dollars elsewhere.
-
The Ross Dress For Less we visited was a hot ghetto mess. Things were jammed on racks which weren’t too closely ordered by size. Robyn quickly tired pawing through racks trying to find something, anything, that would work. I’m sure there are some great deals for those willing to take the time to mine for the “gems” among the “trash” but it’s not for us.
-
The Kolh’s Department Store in Huntington Beach and Huntington Beach both proved to be major disappointments. Their “Woman’s Wear” departments were small, disorganized and didn’t offer much in the way of quality or selection. The jeans Robyn found were skimpy and overpriced, The one pair she found didn’t fit well so, needless to say, she didn’t buy them.
-
Wal-Mart had several jeans-styles in a number of colors. Their jeans are at least as well made as anything we found at other stores--and sold for about half the price. Wal-Mart does have one issue that really surprised us: their sizing is smaller than anywhere else we found. (Robyn tried on three pairs of Size 20W jeans and they were too small in the waist. (She refused to try on 22Ws--even for the sake of cheap jeans!)
-
We had the single-best experience of either “Jeans Quest” at, of all places, Lane Bryant. Our Clerk (and I’m sorry I didn’t get her name) put the “service” in Customer Service Representative. She measured Robyn, found her a pair of jeans and then brought her a second pair when she learned Robyn didn’t like the way the first pair fit. She ended up buying the second pair (and couldn’t have bought more since the had the jeans available in multiple colors. Of course this didn’t come cheap. She ended up paying almost fifty bucks for the jeans she finally bought--about ten dollars more than anywhere else we looked. Still, I guess you get what you pay for--and she paid quite enough.
-
I’m just glad this chore is done for the foreseeable future…
Today’s post begins with a fractal called Chakra Spiral. It has nothing to do with anything: I just picked it because I liked the image and I thought the blog needed a shot of color. That being said, on with the review!
-
Monday Robyn and I went to see the current box-office champ Jumper. I wasn’t expecting much since I’d read several reviews and seen extensive coverage of the press tour on KTLA. (20th Century Fox paid for Sam Rubin and about 20 other journalists to visit Cairo and Rome for a week) so I wasn’t expecting a lot--and I wasn’t let down.
-
15 year-old loser Dan Rice (Haden Christiansen) discovers powers of teleportation after an accident sends him into an icy river. Since his home life is total crap and he has no friends Dan decides to simply fade away and let everyone think him dead. The movie then skips ahead five years to find Dan is living the high life as a NYC Playboy (making his money by robbing banks--he even leaves I.O.U.s) where he ends running afoul of the “Paladin“ Roland--played by Samuel L. Jackson in full “badass“ mode. We later learn that “Paladins” are a well-funded and highly organized group of fanatics who have been hunting “Jumpers” for years since "only God should have the power to be everywhere at once.”) Dan barely manages to escape Roland’s attack and, for reasons I can’t fathom. decides to go back home to find his old girlfriend Sarah (Rachel Bilson). Dan whisks Sarah off to Rome for a romantic holiday. At the Roman Coliseum they encounter another Jumper (played by Jamie Bell) who for reasons never explained has been tracking Dan for ten years--even though they look to be roughly the same age. What follows is a “round the world” chase and battle the Paladins and theJumpers. A weird subplot involving Dan's mother (played by Dianne Lane) who has a secret of her own is thrown in--but that makes no more sense than the rest of the story.
-
I have so many problems with this movie I don't know where to begin. Haden Christiansen is pretty enough but he has the charisma of a limp dishrag and no chmistry with his leading lady. Jamie Bell’s motives are never explained--nor is much of anything else. Worse yet, Jumper doesn’t even stick to its own plot conceits--making any half-way aware watcher go “huh? How’d that happen?” There are more hole in the plot than you’d find in the average 100 pound wheel of Swiss Cheese and the story changes facts from begining to end--making for a confusing mess. Instead the movie relies on fast pace, cool teleportation effects and shots of famous places. (The movie had locations as diverse as Rome, the Pyramids of Giza, Paris, Tokyo, and New York City. (Maybe they had such a big travel budget they couldn’t afford decent actors or writers.)
-
Is Jumper the worst movie I’ve ever seen? Not by a long shot--but it comes close. It is the worst movie I’ve seen since I’ve been reviewing movies on this blog. There is nothing worthwhile here for anyone who is half way rational--yet somehow this was the Number One movie at the Box Office this week--and may repeat that feat next week so what does it say about my credentials as a critic? Do yourself and everyone else a favor and avoid this colossal turkey.
-
FINAL GRADE: F
No fractal for this post--just a brief update to keep my "loyal readers" up on news I've covered...-It seems the firing on Duane "Dog the Bounty Hunter" Chap man didn't take over at the A&E Network (and really--who didn't see that coming?) I guess we're a lot more tolerant of racist remarks than I thought. ANYway--part of me is a bit curious to see how/if they cover the "incident" on his show.
Today’s post begins with a fractal called In Memory. I created it the day of the bus bombings in London to honor the victims there but I guess the image will serve to memorialize all victims of needless violence.
-
There have been several shootings in the news this past week that have really occupied my mind. Don’t worry--this won’t be a polemic on gun control: nothing I can say will change anyone’s minds--be they for or against. I just felt the need to put “pen to paper” (as it were) to express my feelings…
-
Today Los Angeles Police Officer Randal Simmons will be laid to rest. He is the first S.W.A.T. Officer to be killed in the line of duty. He died shielding his fellow officers from bullets fired by a deranged young man who had already killed his father and two brothers. (Edwin Rivera was reportedly distraught over the death of his mother several years earlier.)
-
On Tuesday February 12 15 year-old Middle School Student Lawrence King was shot in the head by a 14 year-old classmate--reportedly because King was gay. The shooter (identified as Brandon McInerny on KCBS TV--Channel 2) will be tried as an adult for murder and the commission of a hate crime.
-
Yesterday, Steven Kazmierczak, 27, turned a gun on himself after killing six students in a Northern Illinois University Lecture Hall. At present there is no indication he knew anyone in the class and there is no known motive for the rampage. (He was a good student and had no “red flags” to raise alarms--although he had recently stopped taking medication for some personality disorder.
-
I think about incidents like this and all I can do is shake my head and ask myself “why?” Why would anyone feel the need to do such a thing? Why didn’t anyone close to them see it coming and why didn’t they seek help? Were there signs of trouble that the those close to the shooters missed?
-
At least in Brandon McInerney’s I can almost wrap my head around it. I was a “different” kid who was picked on in school because I was artistic and somewhat too emotional and I know how calculatingly cruel children can be. But I still have to ask myself--what the hell was this kid thinking??? (Obviously, as a 15 year-old he WASN’T thinking--but still!) I understand he was living with his grandfather (so there had to be some family issues) but I still can’t figure out where he got the idea that getting a gun and shooting someone FOR ANY REASON would be a good idea. Was he goaded into it by his buddies or did he come up with the idea all on his own. The kid’s grandfather reportedly doesn’t own a gun so where does a 14 year-old manage to get one? How could such a thing happen?
-
Above all I wonder if he even understands what he did. I suspect the answer would be no. I imagine he must be upset and afraid (and I’m sure his family must be devastated). Still, none of this is an excuse to let the kid off for what he did: I hope he’s punished to the full extent of the law. Maybe, just maybe that will dissuade other kids from doing the same thing (although I really doubt that.)
-
What can we do? I don’t know. Watch the people close to us, make sure they stay on meds and report any signs of trouble. Praying would probably help too.
My blog is one year old today. To celebrate I selected Arabic Square 52 as today’s fractal. I chose it because another in the series was the first image to grace this blog and the gold color of this one looks suitably festive--if not pompous…
-
So it’s been a year since I started my blog. In that year…
-
* the Dixie Chicks released an album to much critical acclaim (and general audience disdain). They may still well be the most hated group in country music. Even more than Big and Rich or the gay country singer--and that’s going some!
-
* Anna Nicole Smith’s death (and the fate of her baby DanI Lynn) was a national obsession--at least until Lindsey Lohan had her troubles. That lasted until Britney Spears had her meltdown. Tablid TV did some embarassingly exploitive on the first anniversary of her deth. Let's hope they don't do it again next year.
-
* the Iraq War continues (but rarely gets covered in American media).
-
* the 22 Freeway was finished (finally!) It’s a nice drive now. Even the freeway art looks cool.
-
* Jeffrey Nielsen made a plea deal before a second trial.
-
* the family of slain Army Sergeant (and former NFL Player) Pat Tillman who was killed in Aphganistan testified before Congress condemning the military’s failure to truthfully report on his death.
-
* Jordan Sparks won the last round of American Idol: her album isn’t doing well. Former “Idols” Reuben Studdard, Taylor Hicks and Katherine McPhee were all dropped by their record labels. Dunno what Howard Stern plans to do with this year’s contest…
-
* Rosie O’Donnell left the view after one too many fights with Elizabeth Hasselbeck. She (Rosie) seems bound and determined to travel the road to Wackyville at breakneck speed. (Hasselbeck took a few months off to pop out baby number two but is back carrying the banner of all things Right Wing on The View--regardless of any facts brought up to her.)
-
* Don Imus was fired from his national radio show and CNBC Simalcast. Later re-hired by a NYC Radio Station. He doesn’t have a national contract--not yet at least The national debate on who CAN and CANNOT say what continues.
-
* Paris Hilton did her 45 days and promptly went back to partying. At least she hasn’t been arrested again…
-
* the couple involved in my “Adventure in 9-1-1” moved away: I don't know how their story ended.
-
* there was no political fallout from President Bush’s pardon of “Scooter” Libby. (On some level though I suppose there didn’t really need to be: “Dubya” has plenty of other troubles to deal with…)
-
* Lindsey Lohan finally completed her Rehab and seems to be doing better--save for a single New Year’s Eve relapse… Michael Vick will be going to prison shortly: his dogs will be staring in a “National Geographic Channel” TV series.
-
* disgraced former Senator Larry Craig of Idaho failed to get his conviction overturned by the Minnesota State Supreme Court. His cause was taken up by the ACLU. Their tack--asserting that under Minnesota State Law Craig had the RIGHT to engage in sexual behavior in the bathroom stall due to a “reasonable expectation of privacy.”
-
* a strike by the Writers Guild of America derailed the TV season for 07-08. The strike was settled February 12 and some television series will be back in four to eight weeks but many won’t return until next fall--if at all.
-
* indicted Orange County Sherriff Mike Corona placed himself on administrative leave (at full pay) for two months then retired (at 90% pay) so he could accept free services form a high-priced law firm. His wife Deborah recently had a major charge against her removed from her indictment. On February 13 his high-priced attorneys filed to have several charges dismissed on the grounds the indictments weren’t specific enough. It’s so nice to see a champion of justice weasel his way out of trouble: it really reinforces my faith in our Judicial System and those who are supposed to protect us. <>
-
* Duane “Dog” Chapman has had his series canceled and since faded into obscurity--along with the rest of his family.
-
* with Rudy Guliani out of the Presidential race Pat Robertson will have to find a new candidate to endorse. Will he go with “Rhino” John McCain or throw his support behind lost cause Mike Huckabee? Interesting choice for a fundamentalist Christian to have to make…
-
* the “Post Awful” and I continue to have unfortunate adventures. I think those people have it in for me.
-
* The Golden Compass was Number One at the Box Office for one week then quickly sank like a stone. There probably won’t be a sequel--which is too bad. I really enjoyed the movie.
-
* Mitt Romney suspended his campaign--pretty much withdrawing from the presidential race on February 4 (“for the good of the party”--effectively making John McCain the Republican Candidate for President in 2008. (Turns out a lot of Americans simply aren‘t ready for a Mormon President--even if his politics closely match theirs) This development allows the Republicans to get a jump on starting a national campaign while the Democrats are still fighting for determine who will be their candidate. McCain clinched the nomination with solid wins in the "Patomic Primaries" on February 12.
-
So--did I learn anything with this past year’s blogging? Actually I did: -* I learned that people actually READ this thing--not just friends and family. Sometimes they comment so I have to be careful what I say here… * I had fun writing it (especially the reviews) and Robyn was glad I got my political bile off my chest in a constructive manner so that was to the good as well. Hope you enjoyed it all and will keep reading--AND thinking!
I picked today’s fractal--Stained Glass 2(A)--because of the blue cross. Check out the post and you’ll see why that’s relevant.
-
I just heard something on the news that simply SCREAMS for comment. Blue Cross of California has sent a letter to its health care provider that, in essence, asks Doctors to “rat out” their patients with pre-existing health conditions in order to deny coverage. The company’s reason is that it “saves money and increases efficient allocation of available resources.” Mind you, this is the same insurance company that last August unilaterally decided to reduce payments to Doctors by 50%. They also reduced payments to hospitals for services provided AFTER RACKING UP RECORD PROFITS!!! This is also a company that has a department which does nothing but research ways to deny coverage to clients and structures bonuses according to the amount of coverage denied.
-
Blue Cross admits they have been issueing this request to Doctors for "years" but stresses that cooperation is “purely voluntary.” However they failed to comment on the ramifications of violating Doctor-Patient Confidentiality. A tiny part of me can see why the insurance company would want the information--after all, they have the right to protect themselves against fraud. That being said, it puts the patient between the proverbial “rock and a hard place”--patients need health care but can’t get it because of some pre-existing condition. Oh, and lets not forget that once the coverage is DENIED the client doesn’t get a rebate for their insurance premiums.
-
The Health Care system in the United States is stick--maybe even terminal. I haven’t seen recent figures but from 2000-2005 heath care costs rose an average of 17% annually while the across-the-board cost of living hovered between 3 and 4%. Health Care costs continue to skyrocket while insurance companies lower their payments (even while they raise premiums). Blue Cross is being investigated by the California Insurance Commission but if by some miracle they get away with this stunt other insurance companies will follow. In the end the only people who will benefit are Insurance Execs and stockholders.
-
Think about it.-UPDATE: thanks to lots of media coverage and much public outcry Blue Cross of California has decided to "suspend" its practice of sending lettters to Doctors requesting they provide information on their patients. Score one for the good guys.
Look at the title of today’s post and you can see why I chose a fractal called Denim. Sometimes it can be hard to pick an image but there are times like this when it is simplicity itself. So--on with the post!
-
This weekend I learned something about buying women’s clothes that really surprised me. Buying jeans isn’t as easy as you might think! I mean--how difficult should it be? Find the right waist size and you’re good to go--right? Wrong! In fact, it is a hard, dare-I-say-it, often torturous process that is frankly too much for us mere males to endure. Here is the tale of how I learned this lesson the hard way.
-
Robyn wears jeans every weekend without fail. It started with “Casual Friday” at her office and she really got into jeans as weekend wear. She has two pairs, one to wear while the other is in the laundry. About a month ago she decided she needed to swap out a pair that had gotten damaged. Thus began our odyssey through the dark side of women’s wear.
-
I found some reasonably-priced jeans in the Woman Within Catalog: (for those of you not in-the-know Woman Within is the new name for the Lance Bryant catalog franchise--dunno why they felt the need to change their name.) Her “boyfriend jeans” arrived early last week: turns out “boyfriend jeans” is fashion code for “they have no ass.” (Robyn is “blessed” in the bootie department.) After this debacle Robyn decided she needed to try on the jeans before she bought. And so we went from store, to store, to store looking for jeans that fit…
-
You might think--how difficult can it be to fin jeans? An item as ubiquitous as jeans should be available in quantity at virtually any store--right? Wrong!!! Turns out even finding jeans is difficult then one you find a store with jeans you have to content with which style--high rise, low rise, straight leg, boot cut, “skinny” jeans (that really shouldn’t be marketed to anyone above a Size 4). Get through that and you have to worry about proportion: many jeans come in short, average and tall. (Robyn is just on the cusp for “short” and “average”--which adds one more layer of difficulty.) I’m not even going to get into the various denim finishes for fear my head will explode. Suffice it to say that buying the right pair of jeans requires dedication, effort and a lot of stamina.
-
Our quest began at J. C. Penny. “Penny’s” is a safe store for shoppers: you don’t have to worry about things being too “edgy” or outré. The quality is reasonable and so are the prices. I thought we’d surely be able to find some nice jeans here. What we found were a few pairs of jeans in two different styles. She tried on both styles in three different sizes but nothing quite fit right so we moved on. (“Low” rise jeans are fine for “Skinny Minnies” but “real” women should probably stay away from them.)
-
Next we went to Mervyn’s--home of all things cheap and trendy (not to mention a high level of tacky). We found three different styles of jeans here (all in "broken" sizes). One pair that “almost” fit but weren’t quite comfortable enough to warrant a purchase. Here, we learned another interesting tidbit about the jeans world: jeans manufacturers regularly size their garments smaller than most other garment makers. (I found this particularly surprising considering the female obsession with size.) From Mervyn’s we went to Target--where we found their women’s wear section to be about thirty square feet. That store had exactly three pair of jeans in total. Needless to say Robyn didn’t find anything she could use here either.
-
I began seeing a pattern that really bugged me--the lack of available (not to mention half-way good looking) clothing in Women’s sizes. Currently the median size for an American woman is Fourteen. According to one source that 40+% of American woman are above a Size 16. Somehow though, this isn’t reflected in the availability of “Plus Size” clothing. There are huge departments for “Misses” (but try to find something above a Size 14) while “Women’s Wear” is relegated to some backwater in the store with few choices (many of which are just plain ugly) and prices that are far higher than would be indicated by the additional material used. This makes no sense to me on an economic level. Why are the stores neglecting such a large share of the market? (I suspect answering that is a subject for another day--by a wiser head then me.)
-
Robyn finally found a pair of jeans that worked for her at The Avenue--which is a semi-upscale “Plus Size Boutique.” Here she five styles to choose from--and only one of them came close to fitting her properly. She paid about $26 (after a 40% off coupon AND the item being on sale). At this point I’d have heave paid just about any price just to be finally free of the insanity: I'm just curious to know when something has basic as jeans became so darn expensive??? Still, at this point I was just glad that she finally found something, anything that worked for her and I wouldn't have to do this any more! -Then she told me she needed to replace her other pair of jeans…
Picking a fractal for today’s post wasn’t easy: what kind of image should I pick when talking about a survey? I decided on one called Faces--mainly because it references a question posed in the Dear Abby column.
-
Many, many years ago (I think it was July 1974) I attended the Bachelor Party of a friend-of-a-friend. (It was my first and almost last such event but that's a story for another post.) A couple of guys there were trying to start a comic book company (oh the dreams of youth!) and that seemed to pretty much be the main topic of conversation for the evening. One guy would blurt out “do you know what our biggest problem is? Do you know what our biggest problem is?” about every five minutes. (Oddly enough "our biggest problem" kept changing...) That incident stuck with me all these years (along with the image of him literally turning green from all the "Cream de Menthe" he was drinking) flashed through my mind when I was reading “Abby” this morning.
-
Way back on October 1 Abby was asked what the single biggest problem was in today’s society. She wisely stated that there was more than one then asked fher readers to weigh in with their opinions. Answers ranged from lack of personal responsibility, to greed (both individual and corporate), the breakdown of the nuclear family, the fact that technology is outpacing our growth as human beings, a growing sense of personal isolation to the lack of respect, discipline, courtesy and consideration of others. These were the responses from “Day One‘ of the column, More responses were to be posted the following day but I didn't feel it was necessary to add them here: personally, I think I can narrow down "our biggest problem" to two--maybe three issues (which are inter-related).
-
America has become a nation demanding instant gratification: we want it all and we want it now! “Easy” credit, 100% financing, “low” monthly payments and a constant media barrage telling us we could (no should) have the latest, fastest, newest, model with the most bells and whistles (and if we don’t there’s something somehow wrong with us). Sadly, this attitude seems to have bled over into our national thought process. We like our news like our food--fast, and easily digestible. We grab it, bolt it down and don’t think about what we’ve put into our systems--be it burgers, fries and a Coke or Rush Limbaugh’s latest talk-show tirade.
-
This mentality has led to an intellectual rigidity that won’t allow for other viewpoints. All too often decisions are based on "sound bites" and slick TV commericals: we don't bother to research or really even think about the ramifications of what our choices may be. We’re right and that’s that. This has led to a decline in civil debate and respect for other people’s beliefs. All too often it seems that we demand everyone think like we do and if they don't they are somehow bad people for holding a different opinion.-Maybe it's just foolish nostalgia but I seem to remember an era (I think it was the 1970s) when we took the time for reasoned debate and we actually thought about what the other person was saying. Today we don’t want to be confused with the facts--or even another person’s viewpoint: it’s all about us and that doesn’t matter what anyone else thinks.
-
This past weekend I was visiting with Bob and Wendy Pyle. (Bob is Robyn‘s brother for those of you who don‘t know.) The conversation turned to politics. Wendy seemed surprised that I wasn’t voting Republican in the next election. (Obviously the dear girl has never read my blog.) I explained to her (oh so patiently and with only mild condecension) that I din’t think the country could handle another eight years of the Iraq War or Republican Economic policy--not to mention what could happen to the Supreme Court if we get a Republican president come November. Our conversation went something like this… NOTE: this is not an exact transcript of the conversation.-
WENDY: I could never vote for Hilary Clinton.
-
RON: Why not?
-
WENDY: I can’t stand Bill Clinton!
-
RON: Why not?
-
WENDY: He’s a complete slime-ball!
-
RON: Why?
-
WENDY: Because . . . -At this point she become lost for an answer. She didn’t know why she wasn’t voting for a Clinton but her Momma would never vote for a Clinton so she wouldn’t! (Maybe she just really, Really, REALLY respects her Mother!) Honestly I don’t know so I probably shouldn’t speculate. I’ll give her that Bill Clinton is a slime-ball! (He is a politician after all--and that’s a trait anyone who aspires to office shares!) Still, if moral character were an issue in our political candidates there would be nobody to vote for. Politics is a dirty business that doesn’t attract clean, upright individuals. It’s the nature of the game.
-
The conversation sounds silly but I’ve had too many variations of it with too many people I know. We’re all guilty of making snap judgments now and then but it seems to be that all too often we simply slide along without really thinking about the choices we make. You know what our biggest problem is? THAT’ is our biggest problem!
Today’s post begins with a fractal called MixIt. Read my commentary on The Spiderwick Chronicles and you’ll probably see why I picked that as the image.
